<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Circuit Depth on oqft.com</title>
    <link>https://oqft.com/tags/circuit-depth/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Circuit Depth on oqft.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://oqft.com/tags/circuit-depth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OQFT Depth Crossover, the Optimistic QFT Beats the Textbook Circuit From 68 Qubits On</title>
      <link>https://oqft.com/oqft-depth-crossover-the-optimistic-qft-beats-the-textbook-circuit-from-68-qubits-on/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://oqft.com/oqft-depth-crossover-the-optimistic-qft-beats-the-textbook-circuit-from-68-qubits-on/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The optimistic QFT is built for big registers. Everyone working with it knows that. The less obvious question is where &amp;ldquo;big&amp;rdquo; starts, because below some size the textbook circuit is simply shallower, and a compiler that swaps in OQFT everywhere would make small circuits worse.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So we ran &lt;code&gt;oqft stats&lt;/code&gt; at an error target of 0.01 for every register size from 32 to 80 qubits, plus a few larger ones, and wrote down depth and gate count for both circuits. Depth counts every gate as one layer, with gates on separate qubits sharing a layer.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
